J. Appl. Poult. Res.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J APPL POULT RES 2006. 15:483-491
© 2006 Poultry Science Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koelkebeck, K. W.
Right arrow Articles by Utterback, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Koelkebeck, K. W.
Right arrow Articles by Utterback, P.

National Poultry Extension Workshop

Nonwithdrawal Molting Programs

K. W. Koelkebeck1, C. M. Parsons, P. Biggs and P. Utterback

Department of Animal Sciences, 1207 W. Gregory Dr., University of Illinois, Urbana 61801

1 Corresponding author: kkoelkeb{at}uiuc.edu

In the commercial egg industry the management practice of using feed withdrawal to induce a flock to molt has been under extreme scrutiny. This is because animal rights groups have voiced their concern about using this practice. Thus, about 5 yr ago, the United Egg Producers (UEP) commissioned 5 universities to conduct experiments to develop alternative molting programs that used nonwithdrawal feeding programs to molt laying hens. The studies conducted to date used techniques ranging from feeding hens without added salt in the diet to using readily available, low-cost feed ingredients to develop molt diets that are low in energy level and protein content. The results of these studies indicated that molting laying hens without feed withdrawal could be done successfully. Research at the University of Illinois found that feeding laying hens diets consisting of wheat middlings, soybean hulls, and corn (low protein and low energy) were successful in providing for acceptable postmolt egg production performance and economic benefit compared with using a standard feed withdrawal method. Therefore, after 5 yr of experimenting with nonwithdrawal molting methods done in several university settings, the egg industry has successfully adopted these methods of molting laying hens. In addition, based on the finding of these experiments, the UEP has revised their recommended molting guidelines to state that only nonwithdrawal molting methods will be permitted after January 1, 2006. Thus, these guidelines will apply to approximately 82% of the US egg industry.

Key Words: laying hen • induced molting • nonwithdrawal molt diet • wheat middlings • soybean hulls 2006




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
W. L. Willis, I. Goktepe, O. S. Isikhuemhen, M. Reed, K. King, and C. Murray
The Effect of Mushroom and Pokeweed Extract on Salmonella, Egg Production, and Weight Loss in Molting Hens
Poult. Sci., December 1, 2008; 87(12): 2451 - 2457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
K. W. Koelkebeck and K. E. Anderson
Molting Layers--Alternative Methods and Their Effectiveness
Poult. Sci., June 1, 2007; 86(6): 1260 - 1264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Poult. Res.Home page
E. E. Onbasilar and H. Erol
Effects of Different Forced Molting Methods on Postmolt Production, Corticosterone Level, and Immune Response to Sheep Red Blood Cells in Laying Hens
J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2007; 16(4): 529 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Poultry Science Association.