|
|
||||||||
National Poultry Extension Workshop |

* Department of Animal Science; and
Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, 1354 Eckles Ave, St. Paul 55108
1 Corresponding author: jacob150{at}umn.edu
The purpose of the current study was to verify whether there was any validity to the claim that consumers could reduce their exposure to antibiotic-resistant bacteria by purchasing poultry products that were produced without antibiotics. Rinse samples were taken from whole carcasses from chickens grown in small flocks and marketed as antibiotic-free. Salmonella bacteria were isolated from 18.7% of all the carcasses sampled. Campylobacter bacteria were found on 96.0% of the carcasses tested. More than two-thirds (69.4%) of the Salmonella isolates were resistant to at least 1 antibiotic. The antibiotic to which the Salmonella isolates were most commonly resistant was trimethoprim-sulfa, with almost two-thirds (62.9%) of the isolates being resistant to it. Almost three-fourths (73.4%) of the Campylobacter isolates were resistant to at least 1 antibiotic. The most common antibiotic to which Campylobacter isolates were resistant was tetracycline, with almost three-fourths (72.7%) of all Campylobacter isolates being resistant to it.
Key Words: broiler antibiotic-free food safety
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. P. Jacob, J. P. Griggs, and J. B. Bender Characterization of Small-Scale Antibiotic-Free Broiler Production in Minnesota J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2008; 17(3): 412 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |