J. Appl. Poult. Res.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J APPL POULT RES 2006. 15:457-463
© 2006 Poultry Science Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Northcutt, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Berrang, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Northcutt, J. K.
Right arrow Articles by Berrang, M. E.

Field Reports

Influence of a Chicken Transport Cage-Washing System on Wastewater Characteristics and Bacteria Recovery from Cage Flooring1

J. K. Northcutt2 and M. E. Berrang

USDA-Agricultural Research Service, PO Box 5677, Athens, GA 30604-5677

2 Corresponding author: jnorthcutt{at}saa.ars.usda.gov

A study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of an automated commercial washing system designed to clean chicken transportation cages. Surface swabs of flooring in chicken transport cages were collected before and after washing and again after sanitizer application and evaluated for recovery of bacteria. Cage wash water samples (CWW) were collected and assessed chemically and microbiologically. Washing cages significantly reduced levels of total aerobic bacteria, coliforms, and Escherichia coli recovered from flooring by 1.3, 1.6, and 1.5 log10 cfu/cm2, respectively. Levels of total aerobic bacteria, coliforms, and E. coli on flooring were further reduced by 0.7, 0.6, and 0.7 log10 cfu/cm2 after sanitizer application. Prevalence of Salmonella on unwashed flooring (1/27 positive), washed and sanitized flooring (0/27 positive), and in the CWW (1/9 positive) was low. Prevalence of Campylobacter (7/27 positive) on unwashed flooring decreased significantly when cages were washed and sanitized (2/27 positive). Counts of total aerobic bacteria, coliforms, and E. coli in CWW ranged from 2.0 to 4.0 log10 cfu/mL, and 1 of 9 CWW was positive for Campylobacter. Although the CWW collected from the second washing station appeared darker than the CWW collected from the first washing station, there was no statistical difference in total solids, total suspended solids, total dissolved solids, and chemical oxygen demand. The present study demonstrates that washing and sanitizing chicken transport cages reduces, but does not completely eliminate, bacterial contamination on the flooring surface.

Key Words: chicken transport cage • cage contamination • bacteriology

1 Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the Poultry Science Association.